NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Liu v The Age Company Ltd [2011] NSWSC 53 Hearing dates: 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10 February 2011 Decision date: 11 February 2011 Before: McCallum J Decision: Reserved reasons for procedural and evidentiary rulings Catchwords: NOTICE TO PRODUCE - whether amounting to an abuse of process where seeking documents also sought in substantive proceeding for preliminary discovery - admissibility of evidence - whether representations by solicitor amount to admissions by client - call for documents under r 21.10 UCPR - whether entitlement spent where affidavit not read Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Evidence Act 1995 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: British Steel v Granada Television (1981) AC 1096 Fairfax & Sons v Cojuangco [1988] HCA 54; 165 CLR 346 Liu v The Age Company [2010] NSWSC 1176 Tyco Australia Pty Limited v Leighton Contractors Pty Limited [2005] FCAFC 115 Texts Cited: Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure New South Wales Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Helen Liu (Plaintiff) The Age Company Limited (First Defendant) Richard Baker (Second Defendant) Phillip Dorling (Third Defendant) Nick McKenzie (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Mr B R McClintock SC and Ms G R Rubagotti (Plaintiff) Mr T D Blackburn SC and Mr A T S Dawson (Defendants) Kennedys (Plaintiff) Minter Ellison (Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/224488
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate