NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AAT v R [2011] NSWCCA 17 Hearing dates: 9 February 2011 Decision date: 21 February 2011 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Buddin J at [2] Schmidt J at [48] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is granted and the appeal is allowed. 2. The sentences imposed in the District Courts are quashed and the following sentences are substituted: (a) in respect of count 2, the applicant is sentenced to a non-parole period of 3 years 3 months to commence on 13 March 2009 with a balance of term of 2 years imprisonment; (b) in respect of count 3, and taking into account the Form 1 matter, the applicant is sentenced to a non-parole period of 3 years 3 months to commence on 13 September 2009 with a balance of term of 2 years imprisonment; (c) in respect of count 1, and taking into account the Form 1 matter, the applicant is sentenced to a non-parole period of 4 years 3 months to commence on 13 June 2010 with a balance of term of 2 years imprisonment which will expire on 12 September 2016; (d) in respect of count 4, the applicant is sentenced to a fixed term of 12 months imprisonment to commence on 13 June 2012; (e) in respect of count 5, the applicant is sentenced to a fixed term of 6 months imprisonment to commence on 13 December 2012. 3 The applicant will be eligible for release on parole on 12 September 2014. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – various offences of sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 10 – offences of producing child pornography and using the internet to access child pornography - whether sentencing judge erred in treating offences as falling into the "worst category of case" – whether sentencing judge erred in relation to discount permitted for pleas of guilty and assistance to the authorities Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Dolman v R [2010] NSWCCA 137 Eedens v R [2009] NSWCCA 254 Glover v The Queen (2009) 193 A Crim R 292 MLP v R (2006) 164 A Crim R 93 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v AJP (2004) 150 A Crim R 575 R v Davis [1999] NSWCCA 15 R v Schodde (2003) 142 A Crim R 307 R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704. R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v Woods (2009) 195 A CrimR 173 SZ v The Queen (2007) 168 A Crim R 249 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AAT (Applicant) Regina (Respondent Representation: Counsel: S Odgers SC/A Goldsworthy (Applicant) J Pickering (Crown) Solicitors: Tully & Co (Applicant) S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/105363; 2009/116896; 2009/151790; 2009/264115 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2010-06-03 00:00:00 Before: Finnane DCJ File Number(s): 2009/105363; 2009/116896; 2009/151790; 2009/264115
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate