NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jonathan James Aiken v R [2011] NSWCCA 18 Hearing dates: 4 February 2011 Decision date: 18 February 2011 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Adams J at [2] Buddin J at [3] Decision: (a) The appeals against conviction in respect of counts 6 and 7 are dismissed. (b) The appeal against conviction in respect of count 8 is allowed and the conviction is quashed. (c) In substitution therefor a verdict of guilty in respect of the offence of indecent assault pursuant to s 61M(2) of the Crimes Act is entered. (d) Leave to appeal against sentence is granted and the appeals against the sentences imposed in respect of counts 6 and 7 are allowed. (e) The sentences imposed in respect of counts 6 and 7 are quashed. (f) All three matters are remitted to the trial judge for sentence. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - various offences of aggravated sexual intercourse and indecent assault - whether verdicts of guilty on some counts inconsistent with other verdicts of acquittal - whether evidence established that the appellant's conduct constituted "sexual intercourse" Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Louizos v R [2009] 194 A Crim R 223 M v R (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v R [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606 R v Preval [1984] 3 NSWLR 647 R v Sloane (2001) 126 A Crim R 188 TK v R [2009] NSWCCA 151 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jonathan James Aiken (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: G Farmer (Appellant) G Willis (Appellant) S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Public Prosecutions) File Number(s): 2009/137300 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-05-14 00:00:00 Before: Quirk DCJ File Number(s): 2009/137300
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate