NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Vella v Hawkesbury City Council [2011] NSWLEC 1035 Hearing dates: 11 February 2011 Decision date: 15 February 2011 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Morris C Decision: In relation to appeal No 10907 of 2010 the Orders of the Court are: (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) The Court finds that the deferred commencement condition B of Schedule 1 of Development Consent DA0060/09 has not been satisfied. (3) The exhibits are returned. In relation to appeal No 10908 of 2010 the Orders of the Court are: (1) The appeal is upheld. (2) Development consent DA0060/09 is modified by the deletion of condition 2 of Schedule 2 of that consent and its replacement with a new condition which reads as follows: (3) The balcony of the tower structure shall not be used for any purpose other than the cleaning and maintenance of that structure. (4) The exhibits are returned. Catchwords: Whether deferred commencement consent condition is satisfied; rural character; overlooking and over-viewing; amenity. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979; Hawkesbury Local Environmental Plan 1989. Cases Cited: Progress and Security [1988] 66 LGRA Texts Cited: Hawkesbury Development Control Plan. Category: Principal judgment Parties: C Vella (Applicant) Hawkesbury City Council (Respondent) Representation: Storey & Gough (Applicant) Mr A Pickup Pikes Lawyers (Respondent) Mr S Griffiths File Number(s): 10907 of 2010 10908 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate