NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Swansson v R [2011] NSWCCA 29 Hearing dates: 13 August 2010 Decision date: 16 February 2011 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at 1 RS Hulme J at 2 Davies J at 77 Decision: Appeal against conviction dismissed. Catchwords: Aid, abet counsel or procure the commission of an offence - attempted importation of not less than the commercial quantity applicable to ecstasy - appellant's knowledge - Crown case circumstantial - whether the verdict is unreasonable - whether Crown's closing address prejudicial -whether adequate correction - whether jury should have been discharged. Legislation Cited: Customs Act 1901 (Cth), s 233B(1)(b) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), s 11.1(1) Cases Cited: R v R (1997) 99 A Crim R 327 Anderson (1991) 53 A Crim R 421 R v Hall (1960) 77 WN (NSW) 605 Morgan v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1988) 13 NSWLR 208 Crofts v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 427 R v El-Hayek (2004) NSWCCA 25 Swansson v R (2008) NSWCCA 56 Swansson v R (2007) NSWCCA 67 Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Anthony Swansson Regina Representation: Counsel: Mr W Roser SC (Crown) Mr J Stratton SC with Mr P Hogan (Appellant) Solicitors: Solicitor Commonwealth DPP (Crown) The Law Practice (Appellant) File Number(s): 2004/14999 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2009-05-13 00:00:00 Before: Zahra DCJ File Number(s): 2004/11/1410
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate