NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Peachey v R [2011] NSWCCA 30 Hearing dates: Wednesday 2 March 2011 Decision date: 04 March 2011 Before: Hodgson JA at 1 Adams J at 2 Hall J at 3 Decision: (1) Leave to appeal be granted. (2) The appeal be dismissed. Catchwords: SENTENCE APPEAL - offender the apex of organisation - similar prior convictions - sophisticated drug supply network - 14 months involvement - marked difference in criminality between offender and co-accused - no error for lack of parity of sentences - findings as to remorse, rehabilitation and special circumstances - open for trial judge to make - non-parole period not manifestly excessive in light of criminality Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Drug Misuse & Trafficking Act 1985 Cases Cited: Jimmy v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 60 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606 Regina v Clarke [2009] NSWCCA 49 Regina v Cramp [2004] NSWCCA 264 Regina v Girard [2004] NSWCCA 170 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Susan Ellen PEACHEY (Applicant) Regina (Crown) Representation: Counsel: J Pickering (Crown) N Carroll (Applicant) Solictors: S Kavanagh (Crown) George Sten & Co (Applicant) File Number(s): 2009/12072 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2010-05-21 00:00:00 Before: King DCJ File Number(s): 2009/12072
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate