NSW Caselaw
Transport Appeal Boards New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Andrews v RailCorp [2011] NSWTAB 4 Hearing dates: 15 February 2011 Decision date: 16 February 2011 Before: Oakman AC (Board) Decision: (1) The appeal is allowed; (2) The decision of RailCorp to suspended Mr Andrews without pay for two consecutive working weeks is set aside; (3) The following disciplinary punishments are imposed on Mr Andrews for his misconduct: (a) in relation to Allegation 1 - fined the amount of $50; (b) in relation to Allegation 2 - fined the amount of $100; (c) in relation to Allegation 3 - fined the amount of $75; and (4) Mr Andrews has 28 days from the date of this decision to pay to RailCorp the fines specified in Order (3) Catchwords: PUBLIC SERVICE - discipline and misconduct - rail employees - revealing confidential information - disciplinary decision to suspend without pay for 2 weeks - appeal to Transport Appeal Board - HELD - appeal allowed - suspension set aside - employee fined Legislation Cited: Transport Administration (Staff) Regulation 2005 Transport Appeal Boards Act 1980 Cases Cited: Duhbihur v Transport Appeal Board and Anor [2005] NSWSC 811Ziogas v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2009] AIRC 703Ziogas v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2010] FWAFB 2664 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lindsay Andrews (Appellant)
Rail Corporation of NSW (Respondent) Representation: Mr B Egdhill, RTBU (Appellant)
Mr A Woods, Henry Davis York (Respondent) File Number(s): TAB 1449 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate