NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Barlevy v Nadolski; Nadolski v Barlevy [2011] NSWSC 129 Hearing dates: 19 October 2009, 20 October 2009, 21 October 2009, 22 October 2009, 23 October 2009, 26 October 2009, 5 November 2009, 16 November 2009, 17 November 2009, 20 November 2009, 25 November 2009, 24 February 2010 Decision date: 08 March 2011 Before: Slattery J Decision: See paragraphs 222 and 223 of judgment. Catchwords: SUCCESSION - Family provision - deceased dies intestate - whether plaintiff an eligible person under Family Provision Act s6 - plaintiff claims to be in a domestic relationship with deceased in last three years of his life - if so, whether adequate provision made for the proper maintenance, education and advancement in life of the plaintiff - whether an order for provision should be made under Family Provision Act s7 - HELD - domestic relationship existed between plaintiff and deceased at the time of his death - plaintiff an eligible person - adequate provision for the plaintiff's maintenance, education and advancement in life not made - order for provision made in the sum of $750,000 from the estate. Legislation Cited: Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW), ss 6, 7, 9 Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW), s 61B(3B)(a) Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW), ss 4, 5 Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Succession Amendment (Intestacy) Act 2009 (NSW) Wills, Probate and Administration (De Facto Relationships) Amendment Act 1984 (NSW) Cases Cited: Anderson v Teboneras [1990] VR 527 Churton v Christian (1988) 13 NSWLR 241 Dridi v Fillmore [2001] NSWSC 319 Re Fulop (deceased) (1987) 8 NSWLR 679 Singer v Berghouse (No 2) (1994) 181 CLR 201 Vigolo v Bostin (2005) 221 CLR 191 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff/Cross Defendant-Susan Barlevy Defendant/Cross Claimant-Christopher Nadolski Representation: Counsel Plaintiff/Cross Defendant- Mr N.A. Confos Defendant/Cross Claimant-Mr L. Ellison SC; Mr J. Drummond Solicitors: Plaintiff/Cross Defendant-Bray Jackson & Co Solicitors Defendant/Cross Claimant- Christopher Nadolski & Associates Solicitors File Number(s): 2007/258349 2008/254743 2007/105263 2007/116247
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate