NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Buttrose, Richard William v R [2011] NSWCCA 35 Hearing dates: 16 December 2010 Decision date: 10 March 2011 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Hall J at [57] Garling J at [58] Decision: 1. Apart from the order made pursuant to s 167 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 the sentences imposed on the applicant in the District Court are quashed and the applicant is sentenced as follows: Count 1: a period of imprisonment of 12 months to date from 26 February 2009 and conclude on 25 February 2010. Count 2: a period of imprisonment of 2 years to date from 26 August 2009 and conclude on 25 August 2011. Count 3: having regard to the offences on the Form 1 to a period of imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 9 years commencing on 26 August 2009 and concluding on 25 August 2018 with a balance of term of 3 years commencing on 26 August 2018 and concluding on 25 August 2021. Catchwords: CRIMINAL - appeal against sentence - grounds for interference - objective criminality- accumulation of sentence - insufficient weight to applicant's subjective circumstances - organised criminal activity - discount for plea and assistance - sentence quashed and applicant re-sentenced. Legislation Cited: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Coetzee v R [2007] NSWCCA 12 R v AJP (2004) 150 A Crim R 575 R v El Helou [2010] NSWCCA 111 R v Stankovic [2006] NSWCCA 229 R v Way (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v XX (2009) 195 A Crim R 38 Sukkar v R [2007] NSWCCA 298 Wang v R [2009] NSWCCA 223 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Richard William Buttrose (Appellant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: W Abraham QC/S McNaughton (Appellant) P G Ingram SC (Crown) Solicitors: Lincoln Smith & Company (Appellant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2009/151506 2009/156951 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-03-18 00:00:00 Before: Sorby DCJ File Number(s): 2009/15150
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate