NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Meakes v Nominal Defendant [2011] NSWDC 9 Hearing dates: 17, 23, 24, 25 November, 16 December 2010 Decision date: 15 March 2011 Before: Levy SC DCJ Decision: 1. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $433,565; 2. The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs on the ordinary basis unless otherwise ordered; 3. The exhibits may be returned; 4. Liberty to apply on 7 days notice if further orders are required. Catchwords: TORT - collision between unidentified motor vehicle and pedestrian at a city intersection - whether the collision was due to negligence of driver - whether there was contributory negligence on the part of the pedestrian - whether due inquiry and search has been established - whether plaintiff's status as a legal practitioner warranted a different standard of consideration of the discharge of the obligation of due inquiry and search compared to that required of a lay litigant; PROCEDURE - exclusion of medical opinion where reports served during the course of trial and not in accordance with the rules - whether special circumstances shown - UCPR r 31.28(4) - medical opinion on DVD evidence of plaintiff's activities - requirement to avoid ambush at trial; DAMAGES - assessment of individual heads of damage - whether superannuation losses claimable by self-employed legal practitioner Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 56 - 58 Evidence Act 1995, ss 79 - 80 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999, ss 34, 126 & 136 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 31.28(4); Sch 7, cl 5(c) Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27 Blandford v Fox (1944) SR (NSW) 241 Cavanagh v Nominal Defendant [1958] HCA 57; (1958) 100 CLR 375 Container Terminals Australia Ltd v Huseyin [2008] NSWCA 320 Dennis v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2008] NSWCA 37 Graham v Baker [1961] HCA 48; (1961) 106 CLR 340 Grill v General Iron Screw Collier Co. (1866) 35 LJCP 321 Harrison v Nominal Defendant (1975) ALR 680 Husher v Husher [1999] HCA 47; 197 CLR 138 Luxton v Vines [1952] HCA 19; (1952) 85 CLR 352 Mason v Demasi [2009] NSWCA 227 Medlin v State Government Insurance Commission [1995] HCA 5; (1995) 182 McMahon v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 308 Nominal Defendant v Smith (1998) 28 MVR 165 Nowlan v Marson Transport Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 346; (2001) 53 NSWLR 116 Oztan v Nominal Defendant (1995) 23 MVRSC 59 Penrith City Council v Parks [2004] NSWCA 201 Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34; 59 ALJR 492; 59 ALR 529 Purkess v Crittenden [1965] HCA 34; (1965) 114 CLR 164 Richards v Cornford (No 3) [2010] NSWCA 134 Sophie Fegan by her tutor Inga Rozenauers v Lane Cove Council House Pty Ltd [2007] NSWCA 88 State of NSW v Moss [2000] NSWCA 133; (2000) 54 NSWLR 536 Strinic v Singh [2009] NSWCA 15 Watts v Rake [1960] HCA 58; (1960) 108 CLR 15 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Wallace Edward Meakes (Plaintiff) The Nominal Defendant (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr H Halligan (Plaintiff) Mr M Cleary (Defendant) Solicitors: Carneys (Plaintiff) Dibbs Barker (Defendant) File Number(s): 2009/338245
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate