NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mimi's Fine Foods Pty Limited v Cimino & Anor [2011] NSWSC 158 Hearing dates: 25 February 2011 Decision date: 25 February 2011 Before: White J Decision: Refer to paras 46-55 of judgment Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for summary dismissal - whether proceedings abuse of process - where fresh proceedings raise substantially the same issues as proceedings previously commenced - where orders made by consent in the Family Court of Australia and proceedings in Supreme Court of New South Wales dismissed - whether orders preclude plaintiff initiating these proceedings - no release of chose in action in orders - orders do not preclude plaintiff from bringing and maintaining these proceedings
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for summary dismissal - whether proceedings an abuse of process - whether proceedings brought for an improper or collateral purpose - offer of compromise beyond scope of issues or relief did not give rise to inference that predominant purpose in pursuing proceedings an improper or collateral purpose Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Civil Procedure Act 2005 Legal Profession Act 2004 Cases Cited: Ferrella v Otvosi [2005] NSWSC 678; (2005) 63 NSWLR 523 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners [1949] HCA 1; (1949) 78 CLR 62 Coshott v Barry & Beard [2010] NSWSC 1324 Spencer v Commonwealth of Australia (2010) HCA 28; (2010) 84 ALJR 612 Williams v Spautz [1992] HCA 34; (1992) 174 CLR 509 Dowling v Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd [1915] HCA 56; (1915) 20 CLR 509 Australian Beverage Distributors Pty Ltd v Redrock Co Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 966 KP Cable Investments Pty Ltd v Meltglow Pty Ltd [1995] FCA 76; (1995) 56 FCR 189 Bell Wholesale Co Limited v Gates Export Corporation (No. 2) (1984) 2 FCR 1 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Mimi's Fine Foods Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Oreste Cimino (1st Defendant) Nicola Cimino (2nd Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Menadue (Applicant/Defendant) H N Newton (Respondent/Plaintiff) Solicitors: Farrar Lawyers (Plaintiff) A J Law & Co (Defendants) File Number(s): 2010/331151
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate