NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v AZ [2011] NSWCCA 43 Hearing dates: 14 February 2011 Decision date: 22 March 2011 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at 1 Johnson J at 2 McCallum J at 109 Decision: 1. Crown appeal allowed. 2. Sentences imposed upon the Respondent in the District Court on 30 August 2010 are quashed. 3. In their place - (i) upon the charge of supplying a large commercial quantity of a prohibited drug, taking into account the offences on the Form 1, the Respondent is sentenced to imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of five years and two months commencing on 26 November 2008 and expiring on 25 January 2014, with a balance of term of two years and 10 months commencing on 26 January 2014 and expiring on 25 November 2016; (ii) upon the charge of possession of a prohibited firearm, the Respondent is sentenced to imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of one year, one month and two weeks commencing on 12 August 2013 and expiring on 25 September 2014, with a balance of term of seven months and two weeks commencing on 26 September 2014 and expiring on 9 May 2015. 4. The earliest date upon which the Respondent will be entitled to release on parole is 25 September 2014. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - Crown appeal - supply large commercial quantity of prohibited drug (MDMA/ecstasy) - possess prohibited firearm - keyring pistol - assistance to authorities - errors in assessment of objective seriousness of offences - error in approach to concurrence and accumulation - sentences manifestly inadequate - Respondent resentenced Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Firearms Act 1996 Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49; 199 A Crim R 486 Wang v R [2009] NSWCCA 223 Luu v R [2008] NSWCCA 285 Hristovski v R [2010] NSWCCA 129 R v McEvoy [2010] NSWCCA 110 R v Sellars [2010] NSWCCA 133 R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v George [2004] NSWCCA 247; 149 A Crim R 38 R v Green; R v Quinn [2010] NSWCCA 313 R v Araya [2005] NSWCCA 283; 155 A Crim R 555 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353; 127 A Crim R 369 The Queen v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; 199 CLR 270 R v Krstic [2005] NSWCCA 391 R v Tolley [2004] NSWCCA 165 R v Thalari [2009] NSWCCA 170; 75 NSWLR 307 Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 R v Dinh [2010] NSWCCA 74; 199 A Crim R 573
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate