NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bofinger v Kingsway [2011] NSWSC 64 Hearing dates: Friday 4 February 2011 Decision date: 21 February 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Associate Justice Macready Decision: Catchwords: PROCEDURE - civil - pleadings - amendment - statement of claim - review of registrar's decision to grant leave to file amended statement of claim - - consideration of phrase 'dishonest and fraudulent design' Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Cases Cited: Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 Bell Group Limited (In liquidation) & Ors v Westpac Banking Corporation [2008] WASC 239 Bofinger v Rekley Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1138 Bofinger v Kingsway Group Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 332; (2008) 73 NSWLR 437 Bofinger v Kingsway Group Ltd [2009] HCA 44; (2009) 239 CLR 269 Dae Boong International Co Pty Ltd v Gray [2009] NSWCA 11 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 Farah Constructions v Say-Dee Pty Limited [2007] HCA 22; (2007) 230 CLR 89 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 House v The King [1936] 55 CLR 499 Minister for Crown Lands v Tweed Byron Aboriginal Land Council (1990) 71 LGRA 201 Tomko v Palasty (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 369 Category: Principal judgment Parties: BOFINGER & ANOR v KINGSWAY GROUP LTD & ORS Representation: Counsel: Ms A Tsekouras Mr RM Foreman File Number(s): 256346 of 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate