NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kayteal Pty Ltd v John Joseph Dignan & ors [2011] NSWSC 197 Hearing dates: Monday 26, Tuesday 27 and Thursday 29 July 2010 Decision date: 24 March 2011 Before: Brereton J Decision: Solicitors breached duty of care to mortgagee to advise of matters discovered or discoverable from usual inquiries which cast doubt on reliability of valuation. Solicitors' proportionately liable for 12.5% of mortgagee's loss. Cross-claim of solicitors for indemnity against concurrent wrongdoer not sustainable. Catchwords: SOLICITORS - Professional negligence - mortgages - general principles - duty and breach - solicitor's duty to mortgagee usually framed by retainer - general duty to exercise reasonable care in obtaining a valid and enforceable security - duty does not extend to advising on valuation of security - obligation to pass on information obtained in course of investigating title that may cause mortgagee to doubt correctness of valuation or bona fides of mortgagor - solicitors did not owe duty to ascertain creditworthiness of mortgagor - solicitors discharged duty to obtain a legally efficacious mortgage -solicitors failed to advise client of matters known or which ought to have been known from usual inquiries which would have caused client to doubt reliability of valuation -reasonably prudent and competent solicitor should have appreciated and advised that contrary to assumption stated in valuation land was subject to flooding
SOLICITORS - Professional negligence - mortgages - loss and damage - measure of damage and loss is difference between actual position of mortgagee and hypothetical position but for negligence of solicitors - claim for economic loss from failure to take reasonable care - apportionable claim under Civil Liability Act - proportionate liability of defendants as concurrent wrongdoers - responsibility derived from comparing blameworthiness and causative potency of conduct of alleged concurrent wrongdoers being borrower, valuer, finance broker and solicitors - where borrower fraudulent and valuer grossly negligent - solicitors responsibility assessed at 12.5%.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate