NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Arthur T George Foundation Ltd v Goudie [2011] NSWSC 199 Hearing dates: 23 March 2011 Decision date: 25 March 2011 Before: Schmidt J Decision: 1. The defendant has leave to file the proposed cross-claim against the plaintiff. 2. Leave to file the proposed cross-claim against Baccus Investments Pty Limited is refused. 3. The defendant should bear the plaintiff's costs of the motion, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - cross-claims - notice of motion - leave sought to file further proposed cross-claim against plaintiff - leave granted - leave sought to file proposed cross claim against alleged agent for the plaintiff - delay and other impact on hearing considered - leave not granted - costs Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 Consumer Credit (New South Wales) Code 1995 National Credit Code Civil Procedure Act 2005 Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; (2009) 239 CLR 175 Bank of Queensland Ltd v Dutta [2010] NSWSC 574 Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited v Bianka Monas [2011] NSWSC 57 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: The Arthur T George Foundation Limited (Plaintiff) Jennifer Amy Goudie (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr A Rogers (Plaintiff) Mr P Batley (Defendant) Solicitors: Baccus Legal (Plaintiff) Hassett Dixon Solicitors (Defendant) File Number(s): 2006/266323
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate