NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CHAND v R [2011] NSWCCA 53 Hearing dates: 14 March 2011 Decision date: 01 April 2011 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at 1 Blanch J at 2 Hoeben J at 3 Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: APPEAL - appeal against conviction - conviction on count of reckless wounding - allegation that motor vehicle intentionally driven at victim - whether Judge put defence case adequately to jury - whether admission of "complaint" evidence caused miscarriage of justice - whether adding of alternative statutory count in course of trial gave rise to a miscarriage of justice - admission of unfairly prejudicial evidence contrary to section 135 and 137 Evidence Act 1995 - application of s6(1) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (ie the proviso). Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: AS v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 218 CC v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 337 Coumbe v The Queen (1990) 101 FLR 466 De Gruchy v The Queen (2002) 211 CLR 85 Healy v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 235 R v Chai [2002] NSWCCA 512 R v Davis [1999] NSWCCA 15 R v King [2004] NSWCCA 20, (2004) 59 NSWLR at [110] R v Lykouras [2005] NSWCCA 8 R v Meher [2004] NSWCCA 335 Weiss v The Queen [2005] HCA 81, (2005) 224 CLR 300 at [35] Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hem Chand - Appellant Regina - Respondent Representation: Counsel: Mr P Lowe - Appellant Mr J Pickering - Crown Solicitors: S Singh - Appellant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Crown File Number(s): 2008/9327 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2009-09-25 00:00:00 Before: Neilson DCJ File Number(s): 2008/9327
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate