NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: V (a child) v Constable Joshua Hedges [2011] NSWSC 232 Hearing dates: 17 March 2011 Decision date: 30 March 2011 Before: McCallum J Decision: Application granted in part; order dismissing costs application in proceedings for offence against s 58 of the Crimes Act 1900 quashed; those proceedings remitted to the Children's Court for determination of the plaintiff's application for costs according to law. Catchwords: COSTS - criminal proceedings in the Children's Court - where charges withdrawn and dismissed - no prima facie case on one out of six charges - whether magistrate erred in dismissing costs application. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900, s 58 Supreme Court Act 1970, s 69 Criminal Procedure Act 1986, ss 213, 214 Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987, s 15A Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002, s 99(3) Cases Cited: Burns v Seagrave [2000] NSWSC 77 Canceri v Taylor (1994) 123 ALR 667 per Moore J at 676 Kanan v Australian Postal & Telecommunications Union [1992] 43 IR 257 May v O'Sullivan (1955) 92 CLR 654 at 658.6 R v Prasad (1979) 2 A Crim R 45 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff referred to as "V" (anonymity order made) Constable Joshua Hedges (first defendant) Magistrate Albert Sbrizzi (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr B W Rayment QC with Ms P Conway (plaintiff) Ms A Johnson (first defendant) Submitting appearance filed on behalf of the second defendant Solicitors: Emanueli Oliveri (plaintiff) IV Knight, Crown Solicitor (defendants) File Number(s): 2010/258938 Publication restriction: The name of the plaintiff must not be published in connection with the proceedings below or these proceedings: see s 15A of the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate