NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: McCarthy v R [2011] NSWCCA 64 Hearing dates: 28 October 2010 Decision date: 05 April 2011 Before: Handley AJA at [1] Adams J at [2] Howie AJ at [82] Decision: Leave to appeal is granted, the appeal is upheld and sentences substituted as follows: The overall sentence is seven years and six months with an effective non-parole period of five years and six months calculated as follows: Count 1: taking into account the Form 1 offence committed on 14-15 October 2007: A non-parole period of three years and six months commencing on 28 November 2007 and ending on 27 May 2011 with a balance of term of one year and six months commencing on 28 May 2011 and ending on 27 November 2012. Count 2: A non-parole period of nine months commencing on 28 February 2010 and ending on 27 November 2010 with a balance of term of six months commencing on 28 November 2010 and ending on 27 May 2011. Count 3: taking into account the Form 1 offence committed on 25 September 2007: A non-parole period of two years commencing on 28 November 2007 and ending on 27 November 2009 with a balance of one year from 28 November 2009 to 27 November 2010. Count 4: taking into account the Form 1 offence committed on 11 April 2005: A non-parole period of three years and six months commencing 28 November 2008 and ending on 27 May 2012 with a balance of term of one year and six months commencing on 28 May 2012 and ending on 27 November 2013. Count 5: A non-parole period of one year commencing on 28 November 2008 and ending on 27 November 2009 with a balance of term of six months commencing on 28 November 2009 and ending on 27 May 2010. Count 6: taking into account the Form 1 offence committed on 16-20 July 2008: A non-parole period of three years commencing on 28 May 2010 and ending on 27 May 2013 with a balance of term of two years commencing on 28 May 2013 and ending on 27 May 2015. Count 7: A non-parole period of two years and six months commencing on 28 May 2010 and ending on 27 November 2012 with a balance of term of one year commencing on 28 November 2012 and ending on 27 November 2013. Count 8: A non-parole period of one year and six months commencing on 28 May 2010 and ending on 27 November 2011 with a balance of term of six months commencing on 28 November 2011 and ending on 27 May 2012. Count 9: taking into account the Form 1 offence committed on 23 August 2008: A non-parole period of two years and six months commencing on 28 May 2010 and ending on 27 November 2012 with a balance of term of one year and six months commencing on 28 November 2012 and ending on 27 May 2014. Count 10: taking into account the Form 1 offence committed 23 August 2008: A non-parole period of two years and six months commencing on 28 May 2010 and ending on 27 November 2012 with a balance of term of one year and six months commencing on 28 November 2012 and ending on 27 May 2014. Section 166: A fixed term of three months commencing on 28 February 2013 and ending on 27 May 2013. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Sentence appeal - Offences under s 97(2), 112(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1900 and s 42(2) of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 - Offences committed to satisfy drug habit. SENTENCING - Failure to refer to JIRS statistics or comparative cases - Whether sentences manifestly excessive - Inherent and aggravating features - Good prospects of rehabilitation - Early guilty plea - Substantial assistance to authorities - Disclosure of offences to authorities - Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act s 23(3) permits reasonable disproportion in sentence. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 23(3) Crimes Act 1900 s 97(2) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 s166 Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 s 42(2) Cases Cited: Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; 168 A Crim R 41 Hili v R; Jones v R [2010] HCA 45 McIvor v R [2010] NSWCCA 7 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Bavadra [2000] NSWCCA 292 R v Berrell [2003] NSWCCA 85 R v Evans [2000] NSWCCA 20 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Itamua [2000] NSWCCA 502 R v MMK [2006] NSWCCA 272; (2006) 164 A Crim R 481 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Robert McCarthy (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: C Loukas (Appellant) S Dowling (Crown) Solicitors: Frances McGowan (Appellant) S Cavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2009/7763 Decision under appeal Before: Finnane QC, DCJ File Number(s): 2008/11/1270; 2009/11/0381; 2008/19461; 2009/7763
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate