NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd - Cassegrain v Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 241 Hearing dates: 23 March 2011 Decision date: 30 March 2011 Before: Ward J Decision: Order granting leave for administration of interrogatories to second, third and fourth defendants Catchwords: CIVIL PROCEDURE - interrogatories - application for orders pursuant to Part 22.1 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2001 (NSW) - whether interrogatories necessary - whether, if purpose of interrogatories is to shield plaintiff or others from giving evidence, as matter of discretion leave should be refused - whether interrogatories to third defendant are objectionable or fishing expedition - HELD -interrogatories necessary - interrogatories not objectionable and not a fishing expedition - the fact that an admission in answer to interrogatories may relieve plaintiff from need to adduce other evidence is not a basis for refusing to exercise discretion to order interrogatories - leave granted Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2001 (NSW) Cases Cited: Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner & anor [2008] HCA 57 Attorney-General v Gaskill (1882) 20 Ch D 519 Attorney-General v Walker (1849) 3 Ex 242 Boyle v Downs [1979] 1 NSWLR 192 Cosco Holdings Pty Limited v Commissioner of Taxation (1997) 37 ATR 432 Duke of Sutherland v British Dominions Land Settlement Corp Ltd [1926] Ch. 746; (1928) Ch 746 Fexuto Pty Ltd v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Ltd (2001) 37 ACSR 672 Gerard Cassegrain and Co Pty Ltd v Cassegrain; Cassegrain v Gerard Cassegrain and Co [2010] NSWSC 91 Griebart v Morris [1920] 1 KB 659 Jajaw v State of New South Wales [2007] NSWSC 725 James v Davies (1883) 9 VLR (L) 140 Kennedy v Dodson [1895] 1 Ch 334 Lyell v Kennedy (1883) 8 App Cas 217 Mulley & Marney v Manifold (1959) 103 CLR 341 Osborne v Sparke (1907) 7 SR (NSW) 460 Papadopoulos & anor v Hristoforidis [2001] NSWCA 368 Pelechowski v Registrar, Court of Appeal (1999) 198 CLR 435 Percy v General Motors-Holden Pty Ltd [1975] 1 NSWLR 289 Potter's Sulphide Ore Treatment Ltd v Sulphide Corporation Ltd (1911) 13 CLR 101 Rapid Metal Developments (Australia) Pty Ltd v Anderson Formrite Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] WASC 204 SC Tours Pty Ltd v Singer [1997] NSWSC Schutt v Queenan & Anor [2000] NSWCA 341 Spedley Securities Ltd (in liq) v Yuill (No 4) (1991) 5 ACSR 758 State Drug Crime Commission of NSW v Chapman (1987) 12 NSWLR 447 Strata Plan 39743 v Linknarf Management Services; Alan J Crowley v Linknarf Managements Services [2010] NSWSC 225 Taylor v Santos Ltd [2000] SASC 305 Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Limited (No 2) (1989) 21 FCR 306 Whateley v Crowter (1855) 5 El & Bl 709 Yamazaki v Mustaca [1999] NSWSC 1083 Texts Cited: Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure (NSW) Simpson Bailey Evans, "Discovery and Interrogatories" (2nd end) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Denis Cassegrain (Plaintiff) Gerard Cassegrain & Co Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Claude Cassegrain (Second Defendant) Felicity Cassegrain (Third Defendant) Anthony Blake Sarks (Fourth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Ashhurst SC with G B Colyer (Plaintiff) Solicitors: McCabe Terrill Lawyers Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Oliveri Lawyers (First Second and Fourth Defendants) Peter Condon & Associates (Third Defendant) File Number(s): 08/281625
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate