NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: SL v University of Sydney [2011] NSWADT 65 Hearing dates: 22 September 2010 Decision date: 01 April 2011 Before: K Fitzgerald, Judicial Member Decision: Decision under review is affirmed Catchwords: Access to personal information Legal professional privilege Legislation Cited: Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 Freedom of Information Act 1989 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501 Chan v Department of Education and Training (GD) [2010] NSWADTAP 7 Daniels Corp International Pty Limited v Australia Competition & Consumer Commissioner [2002] HCA 49; (2002) 213 CLR 543 Director General, Attorney General's Department v Cianfrano (GD) [2006] NSWADTAP 26 Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [1999] HCA 67; (1999) 201 CLR 49 Fitzpatrick v NSW Office of Liquor v Gaming [2010] NSW ADT 72 General Manager WorkCover Authority of NSW v Law Society NSW [2006] NSWCA 84 Howell v Macquarie University [2008] NSWCA 26 Waterford v Commonwealth [1987] HCA 25 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: SL (applicant) University of Sydney (respondent) Representation: In person (applicant) Kerry Rehn (respondent) File Number(s): 093329 Publication restriction: Section 75(2)(b) of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 applies in relation to the identity of the applicant.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate