NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: John Frederick Hillam v Leduva Pty Limited (No. 2) [2011] NSWSC 247 Hearing dates: 10 February 2011, 4 March 2011 Decision date: 31 March 2011 Before: Slattery J Decision: See paragraph [58] of judgment. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - miscellaneous procedural rulings judgment given but not entered -undertaking to Court withdrawn after judgment - - application for leave to re-open - re-opening on single issue without cross-examination - HELD - leave to re-open granted.
EQUITY - remedies - specific performance - whether plaintiff ready, willing and able to complete contract for sale of land - HELD - plaintiff not ready, willing and able to perform - specific performance refused. Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 36.16 Cases Cited: Ample Source International Ltd v Bonython Metals Group Pty Ltd; in the matter of Bonython Metals Group Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1479 Ample Source International Ltd v Bonython Metals Group Pty Ltd; in the matter of Bonython Metals Group Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2011] FCA 7 Atkins v National Australia Bank (1994) 34 NSWLR 155 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No. 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300 DJL v Central Authority (2000) 201 CLR 226 Fox v Commission for Superannuation (No. 2) (1999) 88 FCR 416 Grylis Pty Limited v Magenta Holdings Ltd & Ampersand International Ltd (unreported) (1989), Supreme Court of New South Wales, Equity division, Waddell CJ in Eq BC9002795 Hillam v Leduva Pty Limited [2010] NSWSC 1360 Kolback Securities Ltd v Epoch Mining NL (1987) 8 NSWLR 533 Pittalis v Sherefettin [1986] QB 868 Re Barrell Enterprises [1973] 1 WLR 19 Re Harrison's Share under a Settlement v Harrison [1955] Ch 260 Smith v New South Wales Bar Association (No. 2) (1992) 176 CLR 256 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418 Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council (1982) 149 CLR 672 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Plaintiff/Respondent - John Frederick Hillam Defendant/Applicant - Leduva Pty Limited Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff/Respondent - D. Perrignon Defendant/Applicant - A.M. Gruzman Solicitors: Plaintiff/Respondent - Richard John Willian d'Apice, Markinson & d'Apice Lawyers Defendant/Applicant - Annamaria Bernadette Marano, McBride Harle & Martin solicitors File Number(s): 2010/287070
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate