NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dwayhi v R; Bechara v R [2011] NSWCCA 67 Hearing dates: 21 February 2011 Decision date: 05 April 2011 Before: Whealy JA at 1 Hidden J at 2 Johnson J at 3 Decision: With respect to the Applicant Fadhi Dwayhi, leave to appeal is granted, but the appeal is dismissed. With respect to the Applicant Badoui Bechara: (a) leave to appeal is granted; (b) the sentences imposed in the District Court on 21 August 2009 are quashed; (c) in their place, Badoui Bechara is sentenced as follows: (i) on the first count, sentenced to imprisonment for three years commencing on 21 August 2009 and expiring on 20 August 2012; (ii) on the second count, sentenced to imprisonment for two years commencing on 21 August 2009 and expiring on 20 August 2011; (iii) pursuant to s.19AC Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) , Badoui Bechara is to be released on 20 August 2011 on a recognizance release order, himself the sum of $1,000.00, to be of good behaviour for the balance of the sentence; (iv) confirm the reparation order made by the District Court under s.21B Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) in the sum of $101,632.00 in favour of the Commissioner of Taxation. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - obtain benefit by deception under s.134.2(1) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) - lodgement of false Business Activity Statements with ATO to obtain GST refund - Dwayhi an ATO verification officer acting corruptly to process sham returns - Bechara a businessman who obtained benefit - Kertebani another businessman who obtained benefit - three offenders sentenced by different judges - Dwayhi and Bechara claim legitimate sense of grievance by reference to Kertebani's sentence - different charges against each offender - different roles of offenders - gross breach of trust by Dwayhi as ATO employee - principle of parity, proportionality or relativity between sentences of offenders involved in same criminal enterprise - objective test of legitimate grievance - requirement for marked and unjustifiable disparity - strong desirability that related offenders be sentenced by same judge - necessity for courts and prosecutorial bodies to actively promote this practice - Dwayhi not establish legitimate sense of grievance - Bechara does - error established - Bechara resentenced Legislation Cited: Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: R v Kertebani; Kertebani v R [2010] NSWCCA 221 R v Wei Pan [2005] NSWCCA 114 Lewins v R [2007] NSWCCA 189 Nguyen v R [2008] NSWCCA 308 Gurney v R; Willetts v R [2011] NSWCCA 48 Pavicevic v R [2010] ACTCA 25 England v R; Phanith v R [2009] NSWCCA 274 Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26; 189 CLR 295 R v Li [2005] NSWCCA 154 Jimmy v R [2010] NSWCCA 60; 240 FLR 27 R v Wing Cheong Li [2010] NSWCCA 125 Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46; 154 CLR 606 R v Mercieca [2004] VSCA 170 R v Rodden [2005] VSCA 24 R v Swan [2006] NSWCCA 47 R v Spizzerri [2001] VSCA 49 R v Nguyen; R v Pham [2010] NSWCCA 238 Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 OM v R [2009] NSWCCA 267 R v Ismunandar [2002] NSWCCA 477; 136 A Crim R 206 R v Hoole (NSWCCA, 17 March 1989) Cao v R [2010] NSWCCA 109 R (Cth) v Petroulias (No. 36) [2008] NSWSC 626; 73 ATR 83 R v Nikolovska [2010] NSWCCA 169 R v Thalari [2009] NSWCCA 170; 75 NSWLR 307 Maldonado v R [2009] NSWCCA 189 R v Bernier (1998) 101 A Crim R 144 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 85 ALJR 195 Lai v R [2011] NSWCCA 16 Alvares v R; Farache v R [2011] NSWCCA 33 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Fadi Dwayhi (Applicant) Badoui Bechara (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr H Dhanji SC (Applicant/Dwayhi) Mr T Gartelmann (Applicant/Bechara) Mr N Adams (Respondent/Crown) Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant/Dwayhi) Elie Rahme & Associates (Applicant/Bechara) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent/Crown) File Number(s): 2008/6136 (Dwayhi) 2008/6135 (Bechara) Decision under appeal Before: Zahra SC DCJ (Dwayhi) Solomon DCJ (Bechara) File Number(s): 2008/11/0334 (Dwayhi) 2008/11/0333 (Bechara)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate