NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RYAN v R [2011] NSWCCA 69 Hearing dates: 8 March 2011 Decision date: 05 April 2011 Before: McCOLL JA [1] RS HULME J [2] HISLOP J [60] Decision: (i) Grant leave to appeal; (ii) Allow the appeal; (iii) Quash the sentences imposed by Sweeney DCJ on 12 March 2010; (iv) Remit the matter to the District Court in order that the Applicant may be re-sentenced. (v) Direct that, subject to any order made on an application for bail, or of the District Court, the Applicant be remanded in custody meanwhile. Catchwords: Criminal law - sentencing - relevance of mental condition - appeal fresh evidence Solicitor's incompetence Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Many (1990) 51 A Crim 54 Araya & Joannes (1992) 63 A Crim R 123 Iglesias v R [2006] NSWCCA 261 Springer v R [2007] NSWCCA 289 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Aaron Terrence Ryan Regina Representation: Counsel: Mr Provera (Applicant) Mr PG Ingram SC (Crown) Solicitors: Greenfield Lawyers (Applicant) S Kavanagh Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2009/126576 2009/74494 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-03-12 00:00:00 Before: Sweeney DCJ File Number(s): 2009/126576
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate