NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Guiseppe and Maria Romeo v Pittwater Council [2011] NSWLEC 1078 Hearing dates: 22, 23 November 2010 and 31 January 2011 Decision date: 05 April 2011 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon C Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. Application No. N0051/05/S96/2 to modify the development consent granted by the Court on 12 January 2007 in Romeo V Pittwater Council [2007] NSWLEC15 for the demolition of the existing "Pasadena" development and the construction of a shop - top housing development at 1858 Pittwater Road Church Point is refused. 3. The exhibits are returned except F and 2. Catchwords: APPEAL - application to modify consent granted by the Court for an existing use - JURISDICTION - substantially the same development Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Pittwater Local Environmental Plan 1993 State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 - Design Quality of Residential Flat Buildings State Environmental Planning Policy No 71 - Coastal Protection Pittwater 21 Development Control Plan - Amendment 4 Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Existing uses) Regulation 2006 Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulations Cases Cited: Moore Development Group Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council (2003) 127LGERA 27 Moto Projects (No2) Pty Ltd V North Sydney [1999] NSWLEC 280 Romeo v Pittwater Council [2006] NSWLEC 645 Romeo v Pittwater Council [2007] NSWLEC 15 Romeo & Anor v Pittwater Council [2008] NSWLEC 1478 Tenacity Consulting Pty Ltd V Warringah Council (2004) 134LGERA 23 Davi Developments Pty Ltd Leichhardt Council [2007] NSWLEC 106 Vacik Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council City Council [1992] NSWLEC 8 Category: Principal judgment Parties: APPLICANT Guiseppe and Maria Romeo
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate