NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Charmyne Palavi v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd & Anor [2011] NSWSC 274 Hearing dates: 08.03.11, 04.04.11 Decision date: 12 April 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Nicholas J Decision: Par 38 Catchwords: COURTS - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - abuse of process - proceedings for damages for defamation - destruction of material by plaintiff when legal proceedings in contemplation - destroyed material potentially relevant to truth or falsity of defamatory imputations- whether conduct amounted to an attempt to pervert the course of justice - whether proceedings should be dismissed - counsel bound by admission made to court - principles considered Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2006] HCA 27; (2006) 226 CLR 256 British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Cowell [2002] VSCA 197; 7 VR 524 Clark v State of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 673; (2006) NSWLR 640 DPP v Aydogan & Anor [2006] NSWSC 558 R v Rogerson (1992) 174 CLR 268 R v Machin (1980) 1 WLR 763 R v Vreones (1891) 1 QB 360 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Charmyne Palavi - plaintiff Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd - first defendant News Digital Media Pty Ltd - second defendant Representation: Solicitors: D C Balog & Associates - plaintiff Thynne & Macartney - defendants File Number(s): 10/375273
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate