NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Williams v Minister for Planning and Anor (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 62 Hearing dates: 28 February 2011, 1 March 2011, 2 March 2011 Decision date: 08 April 2011 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pain J Decision: 10/40499 1. The Applicant's summons filed on 28 June 2010 dismissed. 2. Costs reserved. 11/40135 1. The Applicant's summons filed on 22 February 2011 dismissed. 2. Costs reserved. Catchwords: Judicial review - whether approval to modify gold mine consent ultra vires - whether failure to consider relevant considerations in granting approval - whether jurisdictional fact raised in s 75W power to modify in EPA Act Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 3, s 5(1)(f), s 5(1)(h), s 5(3) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 75H, s 75I, s 75J, s 75W,s 96, s 123, s 124, Div 1 Pt 3A, Div 2 Pt 3A, Div 5, Pt 3A Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 cl 8J(8) Environmental Planning and Assessment (Amendment) Miscellaneous Regulation 2010 Sch 1 Interpretation Act 1987 s 3(1), s 6, s 31 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 476(1)(g) (repealed), s 476(4) (repealed) Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1991 s 6(2) Cases Cited: Anderson v Director-General, Department of Environment and Conservation [2006] NSWLEC 12; (2006) 144 LGERA 43 Anderson v Director General of the Department of Environment and Climate Change [2008] NSWCA 337; (2008) 163 LGERA 400 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321 Barrick Australia Ltd v Williams [2009] NSWCA 275; (2009) 74 NSWLR 733 Boral Resources (Country) Pty Ltd v Clarence Valley Council; Cemex Australia Pty Ltd v Clarence Valley Council [2009] NSWLEC 81; (2009) 167 LGERA 134 Brown v Brook (1971) 125 CLR 275 Buresti v Beveridge (1998) 88 FCR 399 Calardu Penrith Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council [2010] NSWLEC 50 Calardu Penrith Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council [2010] NSWCA 189; (2010) 174 LGERA 446 Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 Drake-Brockman v Minister for Planning [2007] NSWLEC 490; (2007) 158 LGERA 349 Foster v Minister for Customs and Justice [2000] HCA 38; (2000) 200 CLR 442 Gedeon v Commissioner of the New South Wales Crime Commission; Dowe v Commissioner of NSW Crime Commission [2008] HCA 43; (2008) 236 CLR 120 Gray v Minister for Planning [2006] NSWLEC 720; (2006) 152 LGERA 258 Kennedy v NSW Minister for Planning [2010] NSWLEC 240 Marrickville Metro Shopping Centre Pty Limited v Marrickville Council [2009] NSWLEC 109 Marrickville Metro Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v Marrickville Council [2010] NSWCA 145; (2010) 174 LGERA 67 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam [2002] HCA 32; (2002) 210 CLR 222 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30; (2001) 206 CLR 323 Minister for Planning v Walker [2008] NSWCA 224; (2008) 161 LGERA 423 Notaras v Waverley Council [2007] NSWCA 333; (2007) 161 LGERA 230 Sean Investments Pty Ltd v MacKellar (1981) 38 ALR 363 Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL [1999] NSWCA 8; (1999) 46 NSWLR 55 Ulan Coal Mines v Minister for Mineral Resources (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 251 Williams v Minister for Planning [2009] NSWLEC 5; (2009) 164 LGERA 204 Williams v NSW Minister for Planning (No 3) [2010] NSWLEC 204 Williams v NSW Minister for Planning (No 4) [2010] NSWLEC 222 Texts Cited: Mark Aronson, Bruce Dyer and Matthew Groves, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, 4th ed (2009) Thomson Reuters Category: Principal judgment Parties: Neville "Chappie" Williams (Applicant) Representation: Mr A Oshlack (agent) (Applicant) Mr M Leeming SC with Ms A Mitchelmore (First Respondent) Mr N Williams SC with Mr C Ireland (Second Respondent) Crown Solicitor's Office (First Respondent) Blake Dawson (Second Respondent) File Number(s): 40499 of 2010; 40135 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate