NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Blackwell v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 93 Hearing dates: 23 August 2010 Decision date: 15 April 2011 Before: Beazley JA at [1]; James J at [120]; Hall J at [121] Decision: 1. Appeal allowed; 2. Quash the conviction and order that there be a new trial. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - wrong direction on alternative count - whether miscarriage of justice - whether jury if properly instructed would have returned verdict on principal charge
CRIMINAL LAW - maliciously inflict grievous bodily harm with intent - construction of malice - mental element of recklessness - foresight of possibility of grievous bodily harm - trial judge left wrong alternative count to jury - breach of procedural fairness of a significant kind - miscarriage of justice - appeal allowed - conviction quashed and new trial ordered
CRIMINAL LAW - verdict - whether conviction should be set aside - whether jury verdict was unreasonable - whether jury verdict was not supported by the evidence - evidence of intoxication - onus of proof of mental element - it was open to the jury to convict appellant of the principal offence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes Amendment Act 2007 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Appeal Rules Cases Cited: Andrews v The Queen [1968] HCA 84; 126 CLR 198 Banditt v R [2005] HCA 80; 224 CLR 262 Bombardieri v R [2010] NSWCCA 161 Bullard v The Queen [1957] AC 635 Cutter v The Queen [1997] HCA 7; 143 ALR 498 Gammage v The Queen [1969] HCA 68; 122 CLR 444 Gilbert v R [2000] HCA 15; 201 CLR 414 Gillard v R [2003] HCA 64; 219 CLR 1 Heron v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 215 Knight v R [1992] HCA 56; 175 CLR 495 Kotteakas v United States (1946) 328 US 750 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 Pemble v The Queen [1971] HCA 20; 124 CLR 107 Quartermaine v R [1980] HCA 29; 143 CLR 595 R v AEM Snr; R v KEM; R v MM [2002] NSWCCA 58 R v Caldwell [1982] AC 341 R v Campbell [1997] 2 VR 585 R v Evans and Lewis [1969] VR 858 at 871 R v G [2004] 1 AC 1034 R v George [2004] NSWCCA 247; 149 A Crim R 38 R v Grant [2002] NSWCCA 243; (2002) 55 NSWLR 80 R v Jackson [1993] 4 SCR 573 R v Lavender [2005] HCA 37; 222 CLR 67 R v McCready [1967] VR 325 R v Morgan [1976] AC 182 R v Stones (1955) 56 SR (NSW) 25 Regina v Coleman (1990) 19 NSWLR 467; (1990) 47 A Crim R 306 Regina v Cunningham [1957] 2 QB 396 Regina v Fairbanks [1986] 2 WLR 1202 Regina v Gulliford (2004) 148 A Crim R 558; [2004] NSWCCA 338 Regina v Hennessy [2004] NSWCCA 50 Regina v Hildebrandt (1963) 81 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 143 Regina v Jenkins [2006] NSWCCA 412 Regina v King (2004) 59 NSWLR 515, 532 Regina v Maxwell [1988] 1 WLR 1265 Regina v Mowatt [1968] 1 QB 421 Regina v Rehavi (1999) 2 Qd R 640 Regina v Rudd (2009) 23 VR 444 Regina v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Stanton v R [2003] HCA 29; (2003) 198 ALR 41 The Queen v Nguyen [2010] HCA 38 Weiss v the Queen [2005] HCA 81; 224 CLR 300 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Shane Gregory Blackwell (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: T Game SC; D Barrow (Appellant) J Pickering (Respondent) O'Brien & Hudson (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): CCA 2008/10926 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2009-04-24 00:00:00 Before: Hock DCJ File Number(s): 2008/11/0655
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate