NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Thomas (Final) [2011] NSWSC 307 Hearing dates: 24 February 201112 April 2011 Decision date: 12 April 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: R A Hulme J Decision: 5 year extended supervision order Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 - serious sex offender - age and ill-health - antisocial personality disorder - unacceptable risk of committing a serious sex offence if not supervised - extended supervision order Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Amendment Act 2010 Cases Cited: Attorney General for the State of NSW v Hayter [2007] NSWSC 983 Attorney General for the State of New South Wales v Tillman [2007] NSWSC 605 Cornwall v Attorney General for New South Wales [2007] NSWCA 374 State of New South Wales v Manners [2008] NSWSC 1242 State of New South Wales v Thomas [2008] NSWSC 1340 State of New South Wales v Thomas (Interim) [2009] NSWSC 1119 State of New South Wales v Thomas (Final) [2009] NSWSC 1410 State of New South Wales v Thomas (Preliminary) [2011] NSWSC 118 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Bruce Malcolm Thomas (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Staehli SC with Mr D Kell (Plaintiff) Solicitors: Mr P Murphy (Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/41563
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate