NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wong v R [2011] NSWCCA 94 Hearing dates: 5 April 2011 Decision date: 21 April 2011 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1] Hoeben J at [71] Garling J at [72] Decision: (1) Grant leave to the appellant Thomas See Yue Wong to appeal against his conviction of an offence under Crimes Act 1900 s 52A(1)(c) alleged to have been committed by him on 29 August 2006. (2) Allow the appeal. (3) Quash the conviction. (4) Direct that a judgment and verdict of acquittal be entered. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - conviction appeal - dangerous driving occasioning death - appellant's vehicle entered intersection and collided with vehicle turning across appellant's path - whether jury verdict unreasonable - whether open to jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that appellant entered intersection against a red light - conviction quashed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: M v R [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487 Rasic v R [2009] NSWCCA 202 R v Nguyen [2010] HCA 38; (2010) 85 ALJR 8 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thomas See Yue Wong (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Odgers SC (Appellant) D Arnott SC (Crown/Respondent) Solicitors: S O'Connor (Legal Aid Commission) (Appellant) S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Public Prosecutions) (Respondent) File Number(s): CCA 2007/15361 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-03-05 00:00:00 Before: North DCJ File Number(s): 2007/15361
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate