NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Francis v CPI Graphics Ltd [2011] NSWSC 317 Hearing dates: 31 March, 1 April 2011 Decision date: 05 April 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Brereton J Decision: First defendant pay into Court to credit of proceedings the sum of $2,062,353.40 pursuant to undertaking. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Undertakings given by party to court -defendant mortgagee gives undertaking to pay into court proceeds of sale of properties if significant risk established that may be unable to do so if required by judgment - construction of undertaking - 'significant risk' directs attention to prospective situation when judgment given - 'risk' pertains to possibility not probability - fluctuation and deterioration of net asset position of mortgagee points to significant risk - mortgagee has finance facility - holding company of mortgagee subject to acquisition by another company - acquisition may permit termination of facility arrangement - finance facility may be insufficient to meet refund payment - cross-guarantee said to reduce risk enforceable only on winding up of mortgagee - held: significant risk mortgagee may be unable to refund proceeds of sale with interest if so required by judgment.
COSTS - Special costs order sought that costs of interlocutory application be payable forthwith - general rule that such costs are not payable until the conclusion of proceedings - factors militating against application of general rule not present - no special costs order made. Legislation Cited: (NSW) Contracts Review Act 1980. (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 1335. Cases Cited: Bagley v Pinebelt Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 830. Fallas v Mourias (2006) 65 NSWLR 418. Fiduciary Ltd v Morningstar Research Pty Ltd (2002) 55 NSWLR 1. Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Catherine Margaret Francis (first plaintiff) Robert Michael Francis (second plaintiff) CPI Graphics Limited (first defendant) Eric Baillie Francis (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr B Connell (plaintiffs) Mr Studdy SC w Mr S Jacobs (first defendant) Solicitors: PMF Legal (plaintiffs) Minter Ellison (first defendant) File Number(s): 2010/ 414257
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate