NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AI v R; R v SB and AI [2011] NSWCCA 95 Hearing dates: 28 February 2011 Decision date: 21 April 2011 Before: Hodgson JA at 1; Adams J at 85; Hall J at 86 Decision: AI conviction appeal: appeal dismissed. SB Crown sentence appeal: appeal dismissed. AI Crown sentence appeal: appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal against conviction - Unreasonable verdict - Whether verdicts inconsistent.
CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeals against sentences - Wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm - Reckless wounding - Whether error by sentencing judge in assessing objective seriousness - Whether sentences manifestly inadequate - Relevance of youth of offenders - Exercise of discretion. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 ss.33; 35 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ss.21A, 54B Cases Cited: BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159 Curtis v R [2007] NSWCCA 11 R v DGP [2009] NSWSC 1154 Gillard v R [2003] HCA 64; (2003) 219 CLR 1 KT v R [2008] NSWCCA 51; (2008) 182 A Crim R 571 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 Vaelia v R [2010] NSWCCA 113 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 Category: Principal judgment Parties: 2009/72037: AI (appellant) Regina (respondent)
2009/72038: Regina (appellant) SB (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate