NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Molly Erica Hoffmann Boland (by her tutor Jason Mark Boland) v Hannelore Hoffmann & Ors [2011] NSWSC 330 Hearing dates: 15 April 2011 Decision date: 19 April 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McCallum J Decision: Parties directed to prepare a joint statement of questions and assumptions for the experts in accordance with these reasons. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - joint conference of expert witnesses - dispute as to materials to be provided and as to questions to be answered Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: HG v The Queen (1999) 197 CLR 414 Hoffman v Boland [2010] NSWSC 296 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Molly Erica Hoffmann Boland (by her tutor Jason Mark Boland) (Plaintiff) Hannelore Hoffmann (First Defendant) Rodney David Rowe (Second Defendant) David Thomas Spicer (Third Defendant) Vicki Anne Butler (Fourth Defendant) Karin Brueegemann (Fifth Defendant) Clemens Alwin Brueegemann (Sixth Defendant) Richard Grahame Roberts T/As R Grahame Roberts (Seventh Defendant) Peter James Barrie (Eighth Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M Joseph SC and R O'Keefe (for the plaintiff) S Campbell SC and B Kelleher (for the first defendant) J Sexton SC and M Gollan (for the second defendant) S Harben SC and G Lowe (for the third to sixth defendants) J Tye (for the seventh defendant) R Seton SC (for the eighth defendant) Solicitors: Stuart Lawyers (plaintiff) Moray & Agnew Solicitors (first defendant) Rankin Nathan Lawyers (second defendant) Hicksons Lawyers (third defendant) Rankin Nathan Lawyers (fourth to sixth defendants) Thompson Coopers Lawyers (seventh defendant) Sparke Helmore (eighth defendant) File Number(s): 2009/297331
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate