NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RH v R [2011] NSWCCA 98 Hearing dates: 1 April 2011 Decision date: 28 April 2011 Before: Simpson & Davies JJ & Grove AJ Decision: Allow the appeal against conviction, set aside the verdicts of guilty, and order a new trial. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - sexual intercourse without consent - failure to give proper direction concerning consent and Appellant's reasonable belief in consent - request by jury for clarification of consent - self-harm after sexual acts - consciousness of guilt - direction required - inadequacy of direction - miscarriage of justice - convictions set aside - new trial ordered. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Rules Cases Cited: Alford v Magee (1952) 85 CLR 437 Doggett v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 343 Edwards v The Queen (1993) I78 CLR 193 Pemble v R (1971) 124 CLR 107 at 118 R v Bertrand [2008] VSCA 182; 188 A Crim R 223 R v Cook [2004] NSWCCA 52 R v Kuckailis [2001] NSWCCA 333 R v Tran [2007] VSCA 19 Stubley v Western Australia [2011] HCA 7 The Queen v Alexander [2007] VSCA 178 Category: Principal judgment Parties: RH (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Francis (Appellant) S Dowling (Respondent) Solicitors: Legal Aid Commission (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): CCA 2009/5003 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2009-12-16 00:00:00 Before: Coolahan DCJ File Number(s): 2009/5003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate