NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cincotta v Huang and ors [2011] NSWLEC 1086 Hearing dates: 8 April 2011 Decision date: 08 April 2011 Jurisdiction: Class 2 Before: Moore SC, Fakes C Decision: 1.The application to remove the tree is dismissed; 2.The application for compensation of an amount of $162 for repairs to a fence is dismissed; 3.The second and third respondents are to engage and pay for an AQF level 3 arborist with appropriate insurance to remove the three branches indicated by red bars on the photograph included in these orders as Annexure A; 4.These branches are to be removed to the point at which they arise from the relevant stem in accordance with AS4373:2007. 5.The work is to be carried out in accordance with the WorkCover NSW Code of Practice for the Amenity Tree Industry ; 6.The work is to be completed by 14 July 2011; 7.The first respondent is to reimburse the second and third respondents the cost of the branch removal within 28 days of the service on him of a receipted tax invoice for the completed works; 8.The applicant is to engage a licensed roofer or builder to undertake the repairs to the roof and flashing of his garage; 9.The first respondent is to reimburse the applicant a maximum of $748 for the roof repairs within 28 days of service on him of a receipted tax invoice for the completed works; and 10.The roof repairs are to be completed and a receipted invoice for the completed works is to be served on the first respondent by 15 November 2011 otherwise order (9) lapses. Catchwords: Trees (neighbours); damage to property; failure of service of one proposed respondent; tree property sale settling after service of tree dispute claim; conduct of first respondent in failing to disclose claim; leave to cross-claim granted to new owners (second and third respondents); reimbursement ordered to applicant for repairs to be carried out; pruning of dead wood ordered to be undertaken by second and third respondents; costs of reimbursement of applicant and pruning costs of second and third respondents to be paid by first respondent. Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Category: Principal judgment Parties: N Cincotta (Applicant) G Huang (First respondent and cross-respondent) S Huang (Second respondent and first cross-claimant) Y Lui (Third respondent and second cross-claimant) Representation: Applicant in person First respondent in person Mr Dai, solicitor (Second and Third respondents) File Number(s): 20950 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate