NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kuehne v R [2011] NSWCCA 101 Hearing dates: 10 March 2011 Decision date: 04 May 2011 Before: McColl JA, RS Hulme J, Hislop J Decision: 1. Conviction appeal dismissed. 2. Application for leave to appeal against sentence granted. 3. Sentence appeal dismissed. Catchwords: Criminal law - conviction appeal - s 137 Evidence Act 1995 - no error in admitting evidence - sentence appeal - evidence capable of constituting special circumstances - no variation of statutory proportion Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act 1995 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Gilmour v EPA; Tableland Topdressing v EPA [2002] NSWCCA 399, (2002) 55 NSWLR 593 R v Lumsden [2003] NSWCCA 83 R v MAK [2006] NSWCCA 381, (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131, (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v Mostyn [2004] NSWCCA 97, (2004) 145 A Crim R 305 R v Totten [2003] NSWCCA 207 R v Durocher-Yvon [2003] NSWCCA 299, (2003) 58 NSWLR 581 R v Fidow [2004] NSWCCA 172 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534, (2001) 53 NSWLR 704 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Walter James Kuehne v R Representation: Counsel: H.F. White (Appellant) S. Dowling (Crown) Solicitors: Legal Aid Commission (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2008/10708 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2009-11-27 00:00:00 Before: English DCJ File Number(s): 2008/10708
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate