NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Inspector Selby v Mark David Coulbeck [No. 2] [2011] NSWIRComm 53 Hearing dates: 18 April 2011 Decision date: 18 April 2011 Jurisdiction: Industrial Court of NSW Before: Kavanagh J Decision: 1. I reject the application of the prosecutor. 2. The application is not a proper one to be considered in accordance with Rule 36.17 of the Uniform Civil Procedural Rules 2005. 3. I reiterate the orders of the Court of 1 April 2011. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - slip rule - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, Pt 36, r 36.17 - application by prosecutor that additional costs be taken into consideration - application to vary penalties - no variation to orders made 1 April 2011 - application dismissed with no order as to costs Legislation Cited: Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Pt 36, r 36.17 Cases Cited: Carter v Wall [No 2] [2003] NSWLEC 94 revised - 27/08/2003 Inspector Ochoa v Mulder [2010] NSWIRComm 92 Inspector Selby v Mark Coulbeck [2011] NSWIRComm 36 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Inspector Selby (Prosecutor) Mark David Coulbeck (First Defendant) Ai Chau Lam (Second Defendant) Representation: C Magee of Counsel (Prosecutor) WorkCover Authority of NSW (Prosecutor) Bartier Perry Solicitors (First Defendant) Zelden Solicitors (Second Defendant) File Number(s): IRC1677 of 2009 IRC1678 of 2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate