NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kearns v R [2011] NSWCCA 103 Hearing dates: 15 December 2010 Decision date: 06 May 2011 Before: Giles JA at [1], Latham J at [97], Rothman J at [98] Decision: Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appellant convicted for various offences of improperly obtaining money - subsequent appeal dismissed - case referred by Attorneys to be dealt with as appeal - grounds of appeal did not involve only question of law - whether leave to appeal necessary - differing obiter views - whether open to jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that appellant was an officer of companies - on facts was open - whether open to jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that appellant made knowingly false representations - on facts was open - whether trial judge asleep or apparently asleep during trial - whether jury distracted from attention to the evidence - not established that judge was asleep - on evidence, no more than occasional appearance that was asleep - no distraction of jury constituting miscarriage of justice. Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW); Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW); Cases Cited: Cesan v The Queen [2008] HCA 52; (2008) 236 CLR 358; Re Coldham; Ex Parte Brideson [1989] HCA 2; (1989) 166 CLR 338; GAR v R (No 1) [2010] NSWCCA 163; GAR v R (No 2) [2010] NSWCCA 164; GAR v R (No 3) [2010] NSWCCA 165; Mallard v The Queen [2005] HCA 68; (2005) 224 CLR 125; Mickelberg v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 259; The Queen v Nguyen [2010] HCA 38; (2010) 271 ALR 493; R v Catt [2005] NSWCCA 279; R v Chard (1984) AC 279; R v JJT [2006] NSWCCA 283; (2006) 67 NSWLR 152. Category: Principal judgment Parties: James Gordon Kearns - Appellant The Queen - Respondent Representation: Counsel: S G Finch SC- Applicant W J Abraham QC & S G Callan - Crown Solicitors: In person - Appellant Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions - Respondent File Number(s): CCA 2007/00003309 Decision under appeal Before: Dodd DCJ File Number(s): 02/11/0041
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate