NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Vekilis v Jarvie [2011] NSWSC 354 Hearing dates: Tuesday, 19 April 2011 Decision date: 19 April 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: White J Decision: Refer to paragraphs 41 and 42 of reasons Catchwords: DE FACTO RELATIONSHIPS - adjustment of property interests - s 20 Property (Relationships) Act 1984 - claim for order under s 20 not a debt provable in bankruptcy - no appearance by defendant - parties in de facto relationship for over 12 years - evidence plaintiff made direct and indirect contributions to the acquisition, conservation and improvement of defendant's properties - defendant filed no affidavit of financial position - just and equitable to make order adjusting interests of parties in property - lump sum payment secured by charge over real property Legislation Cited: Property (Relationships) Act 1984 Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Civil Procedure Act 2005 Cases Cited: Fisher v Fisher (1986) 161 CLR 438 Byczko v Sheahan [2005] FMCA 169 Valera Pty Limited v Walker [2010] NSWSC 1492 Valera Pty Limited v Walker (No. 2) [2010] NSWSC 1493 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Georgia Vekilis (Plaintiff) Russell Alan Jarvie (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J Shaw (Plaintiff) No appearance for the Defendant Solicitors: Robert Tricca & Associates (Plaintiff) File Number(s): 2009/337849 and 2010/231689
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate