NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Director General, Department of Services, Technology and Administration v Veall & Ors (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 358 Hearing dates: 24.3.2011; 11.4.2011; 14.4.2011; 02.5.2011 Decision date: 03 May 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: BUDDIN J Decision: (a) Between 1 March 2003 and 3 August 2009, TLC engaged in conduct which was misleading or deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive within the meaning of s 52 of the TPA and s 42 of the FTA . It also engaged in conduct which was unconscionable within the meaning of s 51AB of the TPA and s 43 of the FTA ; (b) The first defendant from 12 March 2007 was directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in or a party to, the said contraventions of TLC within the meaning of s 75B of the TPA and s 61 of the FTA ; (c) The third defendant was directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in or a party to, the said contraventions of TLC within the meaning of s 75B of the TPA and s 61 of the FTA . Catchwords: Introduction agency - allegations of misleading and deceptive conduct - allegations of unconscionable conduct - accessorial liability of the defendants - ex parte proceedings Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Cases Cited: Ainsworth v Burden [2005] NSWCA 174 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Black on White Pty Limited [2001] FCA 187 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v IMB Group Pty Ltd [2003] FCAFC 17 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Kaye [2004] FCA 1363 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Maxwell [2006] NSWSC 1052 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Sydney Investment House Equities Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1224 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Limited (2004) 218 CLR 592 Compac Computer Australia Pty Ltd v Merry (1998) 157 ALR 1 Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 Crocodile Marketing v Griffith Vintners (1989) 28 NSWLR 539 Daniels v Anderson (1995) 37 NSWLR 438 Director-General of the Department of Fair Trading v Monaghan [2003] NSWSC 1099 Director General, Department of Services, Technology and Administration v Veall [2011] NSWSC 209 [No 1] Galea v Bagtrans Pty Limited [2010] NSWCA 350 Higgins v Sinclair [2011] NSWSC 163 Houghton v Arms (2006) 225 CLR 553 Medical Benefits Fund of Australia v Cassidy (2003) 205 ALR 402 Motor Trade Finances Prestige Leasing Pty Ltd v Elderslie Finance Group Corp Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1348 National Australia Bank Ltd v McCann [2010] NSWSC 766 Pereira v Director of Public Prosecutions (1988) 82 ALR 217 Rafferty v Time 2000 West Pty Limited (No 4) [2010] FCA 725 Sydneywide Distributors Pty Ltd v Red Bull Australia Pty Ltd [2002] FCAFC 157 WesTrac Pty Ltd v Eastcoast OTR Tyres Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 728 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Director General, Department of Services, Technology and Administration (Plaintiff) Hollie Veall (First Defendant) Helen Dimitrijevski (Second Defendant) Zivko Dimitrijevski (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: G Sarginson (Plaintiff) No appearance (Defendants) Solicitors: Ms B Mauro File Number(s): 2009/325996
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate