NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Harris [2011] NSWCCA 105 Hearing dates: 1 April 2011 Decision date: 04 May 2011 Before: Simpson J at 1; Davies J at 121; Grove AJ at 122 Decision: Crown appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - Crown appeal - asserted manifest inadequacy - individual and aggregate sentences - multiple offences - aggravated carjacking - robbery in company - Form 1 offences - escape lawful custody - offender on parole - pleas of guilty - mental illness - drug addiction - youth age - personal circumstances - error in failure to accumulate - finding of special circumstances - no manifest inadequacy CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - structure of sentences - no part of overall non-parole period solely referrable to most serious offence - exercise of discretion - appeal dismissed CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - robbery in company - sentences well below range specified in R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111 - whether excessive emphasis placed on mental illness - circumstances warranting sentence imposed - no manifest inadequacy CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - escape lawful custody - where sentences imposed on co-offenders identified as manifestly inadequate - where increased sentence might occasion unfair disparity CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - classification as "extremely high-risk" inmate - onerous conditions of incarceration - offender referred by sentencing judge to Drug Court - s 18B Drug Court Act 1998 - "eligible convicted offender" - circumstances calling for dismissal of Crown appeal Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drug Court Act 1998 Cases Cited: Cvitan v R [2009] NSWCCA 156 Green v The Queen; Quinn v The Queen [2011] HCATrans 71 R v Barker; R v Gibson [2006] NSWCCA 20 R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102; 195 A Crim R 1 R v Green and Quinn [2010] NSWCCA 313 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 R v Kelly [2010] NSWCCA 259 R v McIvor [2002] NSWCCA 490; 136 A Crim R 366 R v Thompson (NSWCCA, 21 May 1986, unreported) R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; 49 NSWLR 383 R v Trad [2009] NSWCCA 56; 194 A Crim R 20 R v Van Hong Pham [2005] NSWCCA 94 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Regina (Appellant) John Joseph Harris (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Dowling (Appellant) C Loukas (Respondent) Solicitors: S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Public Prosecutions) (Appellant) Aboriginal Legal Services Ltd (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/39757; 2009/136024 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2010-11-05 00:00:00 Before: Flannery DCJ File Number(s): 2009/39757; 2009/136024
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate