NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hu v PS Securities Pty Ltd as trustee of the Joseph Family Trust & anor [2011] NSWSC 362 Decision date: 03 May 2011 Before: Ward J Decision: Costs orders made in favour of second defendant only Catchwords: COSTS - applications by each of the parties as to costs of applications for leave to bring derivative proceedings and to strike out plaintiff's statement of claim - application by second defendant for indemnity costs assessable and payable forthwith - HELD - plaintiff to pay second defendant's costs of on party/party basis of day's hearing only - costs to be assessed and payable forthwith - no other order as to costs Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Cases Cited: Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc v Tobacco Institute (Aust) Limited (1991) 100 ALR 568 Bostik Australia Pty Limited v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304 Bowen Investments Pty Limited v TAB Corp Holdings Limited (No 2) [2008] FCAFC 107 Cantle v Douglas [1921] St R Qd 253 Dodds Family Investments Pty Limited v Lane Industries Pty Limited (1993) 26 IPR 261 Fexuto v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Limited (No 3) (1998) 30 ACSR 20 Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Limited v International Produce Merchants Pty Limited (1988) 81 ALR 397 Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (1986) ATPR 40-748 James v Surf Road Nominees (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 296 Mitropolous v Greek Orthodox Church and Community of Marrickville & District Ltd (1993) 10 ACSR 134 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72 Owners Strata Plan No 64970 v Austruc Constructions Ltd (in liq) (No 5) [2010] NSWSC 568 Pacific General Securities Limited v Soliman & Sons Pty Limited [2006] NSWSC 724 Ritter v Godfrey [1920] 2 KB 47 Roache v News Group Newspapers [1998] EMLR 161 Timms v Clift [1998] 2 Qd R 100 Category: Costs Parties: Helena Hu (Plaintiff) PS Securities Pty Ltd as Trustee of the Joseph Family Trust (First Defendant) Alphena Pty Ltd (in liq) (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: M W Young with S O'Brien (Plaintiff) H Stowe (First Defendant) M Condon (Second Defendant) Solicitors: Dixon Holmes du Pont Lawyers (Plaintiff) Mooney & Kennedy (First Defendant) Sage Solicitors (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 10/425147
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate