NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lees and anor v Cessnock City Council [2011] NSWLEC 1098 Hearing dates: 20 April 2011, written submissions 29 April 2011 Decision date: 02 May 2011 Before: Brown C Decision: Appeal upheld Catchwords: MODIFICATION - condition requiring setback of dwelling to existing poultry shed - odour Legislation Cited: Cessnock Development Control Plan 2006 Cessnock Local Environmental Plan 1989 draft Cessnock Local Environmental Plan 2010 Environment Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Hunter Regional Environmental Plan 1989 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 State Environmental Planning Policy (Rural Lands) 2008 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Ali v Liverpool City Council [2009] NSWLEC 1327 Jonah Pty Limited v Pittwater Council [2006] NSWLEC 99 Lees and anor v Cessnock City Council [2008] NSWLEC 1221 Moto Projects (No 2) Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGERA 298 North Sydney Council v Michael Standley & Associates Pty Ltd (97 LGERA 443 Windy Dropdown Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [2000] NSWLEC 240 Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 373 Category: Principal judgment Parties: APPLICANT Geoffrey Lees and Julie Radford
RESPONDENT Cessnock City Council Representation: APPLICANT Mr G Williams, solicitor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate