Jamal Charara v Integrex Pty Limited [2011] NSWCA 113

Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jamal Charara v Integrex Pty Limited [2011] NSWCA 113 Hearing dates: 3 May 2011 Decision date: 03 May 2011 Before: Hodgson JA at [1], [11]; Sackville AJA at [10] Decision: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.] Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - Application for leave to appeal from decision to set aside statutory demand - Whether primary judge had sufficiently enquired into whether there was a genuine dispute as to the existence of the debt - Leave to appeal refused. Legislation Cited: Corporations Act s 459H Cases Cited: Mibor Investments Pty Limited v Commonwealth Bank [1994] 2 VR 290 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Jamal CHARARA (applicant) INTEGREX PTY LIMITED ACN 096 255 257 (respondent) Representation: Jamal CHARARA (in person) (applicant) D P O'CONNOR (respondent) Self-represented (applicant) Mercantile Legal (respondent) File Number(s): 2010/152993 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9111 Citation: Integrex Pty Ltd v Charara [2010] NSWSC 1131 Date of Decision: 2010-09-28 00:00:00 Before: Palmer J File Number(s): 2010/152993