NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer v Perfume Empire Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 379 Hearing dates: 2 May 2011 Decision date: 05 May 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Barrett J Decision: Plaintiff's interlocutory process seeking termination of voluntary administration dismissed Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - voluntary administration - application for order terminating administration - applicant is plaintiff under pending winding up summons - plaintiff/applicant contends that preference recoveries for the benefit of creditors in a winding up will potentially be greater if the administration is terminated before a winding up order is made - consequent desire of plaintiff/applicant to avoid winding up by resolution of creditors in the administration or by order of the court while the administration subsists - potentially greater returns for creditors through preference recoveries is the only ground on which application for termination of administration is advanced - not a sufficient ground for the exercise of s 447A jurisdiction Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Part 5.3A, Part 5.7B, ss 9, 436A, 447A, 513A, 513B Cases Cited: Aloridge v Christianos (1994) 13 ACSR 99 Australasian Memory Pty Ltd v Brien [2000] HCA 30; (2000) 200 CLR 270 Blacktown City Council v Macarthur Telecommunications Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 883; (2003) 47 ACSR 391 Brett Southern v Heartwood Architectural Timber & Joinery Pty Ltd [2008] QSC 354 Cawthorn v Keira Constructions Pty Ltd (1994) 33 NSWLR 607 Foti v P&S Investments Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1409 Plumbers Supplies Co-operative Limited v Firedam Civil Engineering Pty Limited [2011] NSWSC 325 Re Sons of Gwalia Ltd; Ex parte Love [2008] WASC 75; (2008) 66 ACSR 253 Rodgers v Radly [2000] VSC 570; (2000) 160 FLR 85 Spacorp Australia Pty Ltd v Fitzgerald [2001] VSC 61; (2001) 19 ACLC 979 St Leonards Property Pty Ltd v Ambridge Investments Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 851; (2004) 50 ACSR 443 Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer v Perfume Empire Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 299 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer - Plaintiff Perfume Empire Pty Ltd - Defendant Representation: Counsel: Mr J T Johnson - Plaintiff Mr P M Stern - Defendant Mr D M Jay - Deputy Commissioner of Taxation Solicitors: P H Legal - Plaintiff Addisons - Defendant ATO Legal Services Branch - Deputy Commissioner of Taxation File Number(s): 2011/39721
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate