NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Sukkar [2011] NSWCCA 140 Hearing dates: 30 March 2011 Decision date: 24 June 2011 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Simpson J at [1], Davies J at [2] and Grove AJ at [59] Decision: (1) Appeal allowed. (2) Quash the sentence imposed by Judge Wells SC. In lieu, the Respondent is sentenced to a non-parole period of 10 months commencing 6 August 2010 expiring 5 June 2011 with balance of term of 2 years and 2 months to expire on 5 August 2013. Since the Respondent has already been released to parole it is not necessary to make the order under s 50(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - sentencing procedure - factual basis for sentence - facts found not to be inconsistent with jury verdict - joint criminal enterprise - different roles by co-offenders - manifest inadequacy of sentence - approach where offender already released on parole - increase in head sentence. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: GAS v The Queen (2004) 217 CLR 198 Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 Johnson v R; Moody v R [2010] NSWCCA 124 R v Cheung [2010] NSWCCA 244 R v Everett (1994) 181 CLR 295 R v Henry [1999] NSWCCA 111; 46 NSWLR 346 R v Hernando (2002) 136 A Crim R 451 R v Hoschke [2001] NSWCCA 317 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49 R v Price [2004] NSWCCA 186 R v Ronald John Pilley (1991) 56 A Crim R 202 R v Swan [2006] NSWCCA 47 R v Tsoukatos & Kyroglou [1999] NSWCCA 106 Regina v Darwiche & Ors [2006] NSWSC 1167 Regina v Rick Barry Swan [2006] NSWCCA 47 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Joseph Simon Sukkar (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: J Pickering (Applicant) J Van Aalst (Respondent) J Hertz (Applicant) Legal Aid Commission (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/42155 Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2010-11-26 00:00:00 Before: Wells DCJ File Number(s): 2009/42155
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate