NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Vilro Pty Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) v Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW (No 4) [2011] NSWLEC 81 Hearing dates: 10 February 2011 Decision date: 12 May 2011 Before: Pain J Decision: Judgment of 15 December 2010 varied Catchwords: Procedure:- whether discretion under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 should be exercised to vary final judgment Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 4, Sch 1 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 22 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Pt 1 r 1.5, Pt 36 r 36.16, Sch 1 Cases Cited: Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation Limited [2010] HCA 47 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) [1993] HCA 6; (1993) 176 CLR 300 De L v Director-General, New South Wales Department of Community Services (No 2) [1997] HCA 14; (1997) 190 CLR 207 Fokas v Kogarah Shire Council [2008] NSWCA 145 Smith v NSW Bar Association (No 2) (1992) 176 CLR 256 State Rail Authority of NSW v Codelfa Constructions Pty Ltd [1982] HCA 51; (1982) 150 CLR 29 Vilro Pty Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) v Roads and Traffic Authority NSW [2010] NSWLEC 234 Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council [1982] HCA 41; (1982) 149 CLR 672 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Vilro Pty Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) (Applicant) Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW (Respondent) Representation: Mr T Hale SC with Mr R Beasley (Applicant) Mr P Tomasetti SC with Mr S Nash (Respondent) Minter Ellison (Applicant) Blake Dawson (Respondent) File Number(s): 30369 of 2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate