NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Garces v TMG Argyle Pty Ltd and another [2011] NSWADT 101 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 13 May 2011 Jurisdiction: Retail Leases Division Before: P. H. Molony, Judicial Member Decision: Order that the respondents pay the applicant's costs of this proceeding, such costs, in default of agreement, to be assessed on a basis set out in Division 11 of Part 3.2 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 . Catchwords: Retail leases - costs Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Evidence Act 1995 Retail Leases Act 1994 Cases Cited: AT v Commissioner of Police [2010] NSWCA 131 Cripps v G & M Dawson Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 81 Gizah Pty Ltd v AXA Trustees Ltd (No 2) [2001] NSWADT 164 Gpi Leisure Corporation Ltd (in Liq) v Yuill [1997] NSWDC 258 Jonamill Pty Ltd v Alramon Pty Ltd (No 2) (RLD) [2010] NSWADTAP 3 Pochi and Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1979] AATA 64 Rucom Pty Ltd and Anor v Multiplex & Ors [2010] NSWADT 1 Salon Today Pty Ltd v MMIR Pty Ltd [2009] NSWADT 71 Category: Costs Parties: Rui Alberto Garces (Applicant) TMG Argyle Pty Ltd and AMCO Argyle Pty Ltd (Respondents) Representation: Applicant - G Lucarelli Respondent - Mr Ramirez, Agent Applicant - Macquarie Partnership Lawyers Respondents – Speed & Tracey File Number(s): 105107
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate