NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Elga Steinecke (bht Robert John Gardos) v Peter Martin Wayne, Diana Lindner, Beate Stricker, Gerhard Levy; Re Estate of Henry Herbert Stricker & Karl Heinz Lindner [2011] NSWSC 428 Hearing dates: 28, 29 March 2011 Decision date: 29 March 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Duty List Before: Brereton J Decision: Trustees appointed for sale of real property held in co-ownership. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - plaintiff under legal incapacity - general rule encapsulated by UCPR 7.10 that persons under legal incapacity cannot bring proceedings except by tutor - not appropriate to dispense with rule to ensure litigation carried on by responsible person - whether Powers of Attorney Act allows attorneys under power to commence proceedings in name of principal - proceedings must be brought in name of principal not attorney - tutor appointed. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - estate of deceased person has interest in proceedings - estate not represented - whether proceedings should be continued in absence of representative under UCPR 7.10(2) - no interest or claim by other person - potential beneficiaries submitted or taken to submit to relief sought - effect of order to convert real property to cash - s66G orders made almost as of right - plaintiff's interest in property is 75% - held: proceedings may continue. REAL PROPERTY - application for appointment of trustees for sale of property - orders made almost as of right - practice of court to require verification of consent of trustees - practice of court to require affidavit of fitness of trustees - requirements satisfied - s66G orders made. Legislation Cited: (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 14 (NSW) Conveyancing Act 1919, s. 66G (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 7.10, r 7.13, r 7.14 Cases Cited: Campbell v Pye (1954) 54 SRNSW 308 Crossley v City of Glasgow Life Assurance Co (1876) 4 Ch D 421 Curtis v Caledonian Fire & Life Insurance Co (1881) 19 Ch D 534 McNamara v Bodkin (1960) 1 FLR 351 Myers v Nominal Defendant [1966] 1 NSWR 659 Rudeforth v Crawford [1926] VLR 303 Spellson v George and others (1987) 11 NSWLR 300 Urquhart and Another v Lanham and Others 2002 11 BPR 20,765 Texts Cited: A G Nevill and A W Ashe, Equity Proceedings With Precedents (New South Wales), (1981) Butterworths P Taylor, E Elms, G Bellew and M Meek, Ritchie's Uniform Civil Procedure New South Wales, (2005) Lexis Nexis Butterworths Category: Principal judgment Parties: Elga Steinecke (plaintiff) Peter Martin Wayne, Beate Stricker and Gerhard Levy (first defendants) Diana Lindner (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M A Friedgut (plaintiff) Solicitors: Addisons Lawyers (plaintiff) Peter M Wayne & Associates (defendants) File Number(s): 2011/77474
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate