NSW Caselaw
Dust Diseases Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: (Re Nicholson) Amaca Pty Ltd v Harry Daines Pty Ltd [2011] NSWDDT 3 Hearing dates: 19 April 2011 Decision date: 19 April 2011 Before: O'Meally P Decision: Cross-Claim dismissed Catchwords: DUST DISEASES TRIBUNAL - Application for costs - Statement of Claim issued by plaintiff - Defendant issues cross-claim - Contribution determination - Cross-defendant accepts determination of Contributions Assessor - Plaintiff settles action with defendant - Order made that cross-defendant pay its assessed proportion of damages to plaintiff - Whether cross-claimant entitled to costs against cross-defendant in absence of judgment - Costs not awarded Legislation Cited: Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation 2001 Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation 2007 Dust Diseases Tribunal (Standard Presumptions - Apportionment) Order 2007 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 Uniform Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Re Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (Cth); Ex Parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6 Power Technologies Pty Ltd v Energy Australia [2010] NSWCA 107 (Re Olsen) Eraring Energy v Babcock Australia Pty Ltd [2006] NSWDDT 8 QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd v Wallaby Grip Ltd and Ors (2007) NSWCA 43; 4 DDCR 331 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Amaca Pty Ltd (Cross-Claimant Applicant) Harry Daines Pty Ltd (Cross-Defendant Respondent) Representation: Cross-Claimant Applicant - J C Sheller Cross Defendant Respondent - D T Miller Cross-Claimant Applicant- DLA Phillips Fox Cross-Defendant Respondent- Moray & Agnew File Number(s): 284/2010/1
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate