NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Feldman & Ors v Blake Napier Ltd as trustee of the Blake Napier Property Trust & Ors [2011] NSWSC 456 Hearing dates: 19 May 2011 Decision date: 27 May 2011 Before: Ball J Decision: The plaintiffs' motions filed on 24 March 2011 be dismissed. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - civil - summary disposal - whether defendants have an arguable defence - whether question of set-off should be determined as a separate question EQUITY - defences - set-off - whether cross claim sufficiently connected to permit set-off - whether defendants entitled to bring claim said to give rise to set-off Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Australian Mutual Provident Society v Specialist Funding Consultants Pty Ltd (1991) 24 NSWLR 32 AWA Ltd v Exicom Australia Pty Ltd (1990) 19 NSWLR 705 Burns v MAN Automotive (Aust) Pty Ltd [1986] HCA 81; (1986) 161 CLR 653 Dey v Victorian Railway Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 ExCH 341; 156 ER 145 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2000] NSWSC 1215 Integral Home Loans Pty Ltd v Interstar Wholesale Finance Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 1464 Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co Ltd (The Wagon Mound (No 1)) [1961] AC 388 Tepko Pty Ltd v Water Board (2001) 206 CLR 1 Webster v Lampard [1993] HCA 57; (1993) 177 CLR 598 Texts Cited: R Meagher, D Heydon, M Leeming, Meagher, Gummow & Lehane's Equity Doctrines and Remedies, 4th Edition, 2002, Butterworths R Derham on The Law of Set-Off, 4th Edition, 2010, Oxford University Press Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Pnina Feldman (First Plaintiff/First Applicant) Rabbi Yosef Feldman (Second Plaintiff/Second Applicant) Pincus Feldman (Third Plaintiff/Third Applicant) Blake Napier Ltd (First Defendant/First Respondent) Michael Moss (Second Defendant/ Second Respondent) Ian Levi (Third Defendant/Third Respondent) Richard Gelski (Fourth Defendant/Fourth Respondent) Carl Reid (Fifth Defendant/Fifth Respondent) Representation: J A D Needham SC (Applicants/Plaintiffs) G M McGrath (Applicants/Plaintiffs) P M Wood (Respondents/Defendants) J Horowitz (Respondents/Defendants) Arnold Bloch Leibler (Applicants/Plaintiffs) DSM Austin (Respondents/Defendants) File Number(s): 2011/231327
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate